State v. Flood
State v. Flood
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Terrell Clifford Yancy Flood, Appellant.
Appeal From Lancaster County
Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2006-UP-182
Submitted April 1, 2006 Filed April 6, 2006
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor John R. Justice, of Chester, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Terrell Clifford Yancy Flood appeals his conviction of thirty years for assault and battery with intent to kill, possession of a firearm during a violent crime, and possession of cocaine, arguing the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict because the State presented insufficient evidence of his guilt. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Floods appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.[1]
GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.