State v. Drummings
State v. Drummings
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Eddie Drummings, Appellant.
Appeal from Aiken County
Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-160
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 5, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Teresa A. Knox, Deputy Director for Legal Services, Tommy Evans, Jr., Legal Counsel, J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Eddie Drummings appeals the revocation of his probation. Drummings argues the trial court erred in revoking his probation without finding a willful violation. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Drummings appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and GOOLSBY and STILWELL, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.