State v. Fowler
State v. Fowler
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Danny Fowler, Appellant.
Appeal From Cherokee County
J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-153
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 4, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliot, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; and Solicitor, Harold W. Gowdy, III, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Danny Fowler appeals his conviction and sentence of three years for possession of cocaine. Fowler argues the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal because there was no substantial circumstantial evidence Fowler owned the cocaine found underneath the backseat of the patrol car. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Fowlers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.