State v. Brown
State v. Brown
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Dana Brown, Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-146
Submitted April 2, 2007 Filed April 3, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dana Brown appeals the revocation of his community supervision and consequent one-year sentence. Browns counsel attached a petition to be relieved, stating he reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss appellants appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON and KITTREDGE, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.