State v. Smith
State v. Smith
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Roy Lee Smith, Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-237
Submitted May 1, 2007 Filed May 15, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, of Florence, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Roy Lee Smith appeals his guilty plea and sentence for second degree burglary and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Smith was sentenced to eight years imprisonment for burglary and three years for contributing to the delinquency of a minor to be served concurrently. Smith argues he was unable to knowingly and intelligently waive his constitutional rights because the trial court failed to comply with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). Smith has not filed a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Smiths appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
STILWELL, SHORT, and WILLIAMS JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.