State v. Parham
State v. Parham
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Joseph Parham Appellant.
Appeal From Orangeburg County
Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-213
Submitted May 1, 2007 Filed May 11, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Orangeburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Parham appeals his conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He argues the trial court erred by informing him of his right to appeal from his guilty plea, which rendered his guilty plea conditional. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we find no issues of arguable merit. Accordingly, we dismiss Parhams appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and GOOLSBY and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.