Brown v. State
Brown v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Marvin Brown, Appellant,
v.
The State, Respondent.
Appeal From Jasper County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-320
Submitted June 1, 2007 Filed June 15, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Joseph L. Savitz, III, Chief Attorney, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General, Colleen Dixon, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: On appeal, Marvin Brown claims the circuit court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a continuance and in granting the States motion to dismiss regarding his petition for writ of habeas corpus.
After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Browns appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
STILWELL,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.