State v. Burress
State v. Burress
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
David Michael Burress, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-379
Submitted September 14, 2007 Filed
September 18, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Burress appeals from his guilty plea to trafficking in methamphetamine, arguing the plea judge failed to adequately advise him of his constitutional rights. Burress also filed a pro se brief arguing his indictment was faulty. After a thorough review of the record and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Burresss appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.