State v. Ford
State v. Ford
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Devon Ford, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-365
Submitted September 14, 2007 Filed September 17, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Ford appeals his Alford plea, arguing it did not comply with the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Fords pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Fords appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., and HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.