State v. Haskett
State v. Haskett
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Willie James Haskett, Appellant.
Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-121
Submitted March 2, 2009 Filed March 5,
2009
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Haskett appeals his guilty pleas for committing a lewd act upon a minor and assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct. On appeal, Hasketts counsel alleges the pleas did not meet the mandates of Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Hasketts pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Hasketts appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Short, Thomas, and Geathers, jj., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.