THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Brady Lloyd, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County
 J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-197
Submitted April 1, 2009 – Filed May 6, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Brady Lloyd appeals his conviction and sentence for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature and armed robbery.  Lloyd argues the trial court erred by failing to suppress certain statements he made in phone conversations while he was in pre-trial detention.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we dismiss[1] Lloyd’s appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.