Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2009

State v. Richard Lee Davis

State v. Richard Lee Davis
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 8, 2009

State v. Richard Lee Davis

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard Lee Davis, Appellant.


Appeal From Anderson County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-452
Submitted October 1, 2009 – Filed October 8, 2009   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richard Lee Davis appeals the revocation of his probation.  Davis argues the probation revocation hearing is too summary for appellate review.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.