THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kimberlee U. Huffstetler, Appellant.

Appeal From York County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-061  
Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January 28, 2010

Affirmed

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kimberlee Huffstetler appeals her probation revocation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. Hamilton, 333 S.C. 642, 648, 511 S.E.2d 94, 96-97 (Ct. App. 1999) (holding that a challenge to the validity of a probation revocation must be raised to and ruled upon by the revocation judge to be preserved for our review).

Affirmed.

SHORT, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.