Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2010

State v. Kenneth Rogers

State v. Kenneth Rogers
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 11, 2010

State v. Kenneth Rogers

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Rogers, Appellant.


Appeal From Darlington County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-119
Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February 11, 2010   


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Rogers appeals the revocation of his probation.  Rogers argues the circuit court erred in revoking his probation   based on a previously resolved violation.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Williams, Pieper, and Lockemy, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.