State v. Howard Dance
State v. Howard Dance
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Howard Dance, Appellant.
Appeal from Sumter County
John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-107
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
8, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Katherine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Howard Dance appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts of criminal sexual conduct with a minor second degree and lewd act upon a minor, arguing the trial court erred in admitting certain expert testimony. After a thorough review of the record, counsels brief, and Dance's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.