State v. Cheeks

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v.

Craig Cheeks, Appellant.

__________ Appeal From Greenville County Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge __________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-423

Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012 __________ APPEAL DISMISSED __________

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Craig Cheeks appeals his convictions of driving under suspension and violating the habitual traffic offender statute, arguing the circuit court erred in failing to (1) grant his directed verdict motion and (2) give the jury an alibi charge. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss1 the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.