THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Derrick Haigler, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2011-200266

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court Carolyn C. Matthews, Administrative Law Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-497 Submitted August 1, 2012 – Filed August 29, 2012

AFFIRMED

Derrick Haigler, pro se.

Christopher D. Florian, of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Al-Shabazz v. State, 338 S.C. 354, 379, 527 S.E.2d 742, 755 (2000) (noting an appellate court's review of the Administrative Law Court's (ALC) decision must be confined to the record); ALC Rule 60(A) ("Unless otherwise We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. ordered, the party first noticing the appeal shall file an original brief within sixty- five (65) days after the date of assignment."); ALC Rule 62 ("Upon motion of any party, or on its own motion, an [ALC] may dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with any of the rules of procedure for appeals . . . .").

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.