State v. Kelley
State v. Kelley
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Cameren Laroderick Kelley, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-203727
Appeal From Sumter County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-656 Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 12, 2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Cameren Laroderick Kelley, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Ernest Adolphus Finney, III, of Sumter, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.