State v. Dunham

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Legerald F. Dunham, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-196669

Appeal From Lancaster County Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-653

Submitted November 1, 2012 – Filed December 12, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.