State v. Rachels
State v. Rachels
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Phillip Rachels, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-209831
Appeal From Aiken County Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-191 Submitted April 1, 2013 – Filed May 15, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Phillip Rachels, pro se, for Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.