Best v. Glover
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Hartford R. Best, Appellant, v. Samuel B. Glover, Director of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Board, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2011-184506
Appeal From Richland County L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-194 Submitted March 1, 2013 โ Filed May 15, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Hartford Best, pro se.
Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Board, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Because a procedural defect precludes meaningful review of this appeal, we dismiss pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Rule 211(b), SCACR (requiring the content of a party's final brief to be identical to the initial brief, with the exception of including references to the record on appeal and correcting obvious typographical errors and misspellings contained in the initial brief).1 APPEAL DISMISSED.2 FEW, C.J., and GEATHERS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.