State v. Lisenby
State v. Lisenby
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-201487
Appeal From Chesterfield County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-335 Submitted July 1, 2013 – Filed August 7, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.