Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013

State v. Lisenby

State v. Lisenby
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided August 7, 2013

State v. Lisenby

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-201487

Appeal From Chesterfield County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-335 Submitted July 1, 2013 – Filed August 7, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia; and Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.