State v. Wooten
State v. Wooten
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Thomas Wooten, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-213519
Appeal From Sumter County W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-399 Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed October 30, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.