Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013

State v. McDowell

State v. McDowell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 9, 2013

State v. McDowell

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Herbert McDowell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-182926

Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-383 Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Hebert McDowell, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.