Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013

State v. McDowell

State v. McDowell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 9, 2013 · No. 2013-UP-383
State v. McDowell

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Herbert McDowell, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-182926

Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-383

Submitted September 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Hebert McDowell, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.