State v. Herrera
State v. Herrera
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respodent, v. Miguel Herrera, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-213538
Appeal From Darlington County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-386 Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed October 9, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia; and Miguel Herrera, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.