State v. Hampton
State v. Hampton
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kenneth Hampton, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000680
Appeal From Lexington County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-493 Submitted December 1, 2013 – Filed December 23, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.