State v. Scott
State v. Scott
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Andrew Brent Scott, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212554
Appeal From Spartanburg County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-456 Submitted November 1, 2013 – Filed December 11, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Andrew Brent Scott, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.