Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013

State v. Renzo

State v. Renzo
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 11, 2013

State v. Renzo

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Robert Renzo, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-209193

Appeal From Oconee County Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-450 Submitted November 1, 2013 – Filed December 11, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.