Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2013

State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 11, 2013

State v. Jackson

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Ontaney V. Jackson, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-207548

Appeal From Florence County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-453 Submitted November 1, 2013 – Filed December 11, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia; and Ontaney V. Jackson, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.