State v. Lomax
State v. Lomax
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Juwan Darnell Lomax, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212485
Appeal From Greenville County G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-072 Submitted January 1, 2014 – Filed February 19, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens and Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, both of Columbia; and Juwan Lomax, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.