State v. Perry
State v. Perry
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Darius M.Perry, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000067
Appeal From York County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge,
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-089 Submitted January 1, 2014 – Filed March 5, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.