State v. Love
State v. Love
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Prentiss Love, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-212037
Appeal From Georgetown County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-195 Submitted March 1, 2014 – Filed May 21, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Prentiss Love, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.