State v. Davis
State v. Davis
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Charles H. Davis, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001408
Appeal From Lancaster County J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-290 Submitted June 1, 2014 – Filed July 16, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Charles H. Davis, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.