State v. Arroyo
State v. Arroyo
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Juan Arroyo, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000580
Appeal From Lexington County William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-338 Submitted August 1, 2014 – Filed September 24, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Curtis Anthony Pauling, III, and Assistant Attorney General Cary Nicholas Goings, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.