State v. Harris
State v. Harris
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. James Harris, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-207968
Appeal From Beaufort County Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-362 Heard September 9, 2014 – Filed October 15, 2014
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Carmen Vaughn Ganjehsani, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Assistant Attorney General Christina Catoe Bigelow, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: James Harris appeals his conviction for unlawful carrying of a pistol and appeals the sentence for his conviction for failing to stop for a blue light.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Brandt, 393 S.C. 526, 542, 713 S.E.2d 591, 599 (2011) (stating a directed verdict is properly denied when there is any evidence, direct or substantial circumstantial, that reasonably tends to prove the defendant's guilt); id. (providing when reviewing a denial of a directed verdict, "an appellate court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the State"); State v. Cherry, 361 S.C. 588, 594, 606 S.E.2d 475, 478 (2004) (indicating a trial court should not refuse to direct a verdict "when the evidence merely raises a suspicion that the accused is guilty," but "a trial judge is not required to find that the evidence infers guilt to the exclusion of any other reasonable hypothesis") (citations omitted); State v. Zulfer, 345 S.C. 258, 262-63, 547 S.E.2d 885, 887 (Ct. App. 2001) (holding when the plain language of a statute provides for the enhancement of the offense based on a prior conviction and the language does not limit the prior conviction to one in South Carolina, consideration of the out-of-state conviction is appropriate).
AFFIRMED.
HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.