State v. Feagin
State v. Feagin
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2012-213695
Appeal From Florence County Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-460 Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed December 17, 2014
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia; and McIver Rembert Feagin, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.