State v. Sadler
State v. Sadler
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kinjta Kadeem Sadler, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000105
Appeal From Greenville County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-013 Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed January 14, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Kinjta Kadeem Sadler, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.