SCDSS v. Farmer
SCDSS v. Farmer
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Loretta Farmer and Scott Farmer, Defendants, Of Whom Scott Farmer is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001103
Appeal From Anderson County Thomas Henry White, IV, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-034 Submitted December 15, 2014 โ Filed January 9, 2015
AFFIRMED
Hugh Wingo Welborn, of Anderson, for Appellant.
Amy C. Sutherland, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Brittany D. Senerius, of the Senerius Law Firm, of Anderson, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Scott Farmer appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1 HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.