State v. Bloodsaw
State v. Bloodsaw
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Thomas L. Bloodsaw, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-000643
Appeal From Richland County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-002 Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed January 7, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Austin Howell Crosby, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, P.A., of Hampton, Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Thomas L. Bloodsaw, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.