Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015

State v. Bloodsaw

State v. Bloodsaw
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 7, 2015

State v. Bloodsaw

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Thomas L. Bloodsaw, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000643

Appeal From Richland County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-002 Submitted November 1, 2014 – Filed January 7, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Austin Howell Crosby, of Peters, Murdaugh, Parker, Eltzroth & Detrick, P.A., of Hampton, Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Thomas L. Bloodsaw, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.