Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015

State v. Reynolds

State v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided February 25, 2015

State v. Reynolds

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Justin Darnell Reynolds, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002637

Appeal From Spartanburg County Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-080 Submitted December 1, 2014 – Filed February 25, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Justin Darnell Reynolds, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.