State v. Frinks
State v. Frinks
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Dayton Carando Frinks, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001127
Appeal From Horry County Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-157 Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed March 18, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Dayton Frinks, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.