Doe v. Chad McDonald
Doe v. Chad McDonald
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Jane and John Doe, Respondents, v. Tiffany N. Edens and Chad McDonald, Defendants, Of whom Chad McDonald is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2014-002407
Appeal From Greenville County Joseph C. Smithdeal, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-218 Submitted April 2, 2015 โ Filed April 27, 2015
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Vanessa Hartman Kormylo, of Vanessa Hartman Kormylo, P.A., of Greenville, for Respondents.
Jennifer A. Jeffrey, of Jeffrey Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Chad McDonald appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a review of the transcript and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's order and relieve McDonald's counsel.
AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.