Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015

SCDSS v. Still

SCDSS v. Still
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided April 6, 2015

SCDSS v. Still

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Kami Augustine a/k/a Kami Nicole Driggers and Devin Alexander Still, Defendants.

Of Whom Devin Alexander Still is the Appellant, In the interest of two minor children under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002552

Appeal From Barnwell County Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-195 Submitted March 25, 2015 โ€“ Filed April 6, 2015

AFFIRMED

Lindsay Yoas Goodman, of Horton Law Firm, LLC, of Bluffton, for Appellant.

Amanda Frances Whittle, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Devin Alexander Still appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his two minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63- 7-2570 (Supp. 2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Still's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.