State v. Raiden
State v. Raiden
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Rufus Raiden, III, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000215
Appeal From Pickens County G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-261 Submitted March 1, 2015 – Filed May 20, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia; and Rufus Raiden, III, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor William Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.