In the Matter of Kevin Nixon
In the Matter of Kevin Nixon
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Kevin Nixon, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000235
Appeal From Horry County Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-295 Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed June 17, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of Law Office of Charles T.
Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).1 Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.2 APPEAL DISMISSED.
THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary commitment appeals).
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.