State v. Dixon
State v. Dixon
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. David Eric Dixon, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002386
Appeal From Marlboro County J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-385 Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed July 29, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and David Eric Dixon, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.