State v. Clark
State v. Clark
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Joey Clark, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2014-000797
Appeal From Cherokee County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-433 Submitted April 1, 2015 – Filed August 19, 2015
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Joey L. Clark, pro se, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.