Zeng v. Coosaw Partners
Zeng v. Coosaw Partners
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Chang Hua Zeng, Appellant, v. Coosaw Partners, LLC and Terry Kinder, Respondents.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001353
Appeal From Dorchester County Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-410 Submitted June 1, 2015 – Filed August 12, 2015
AFFIRMED
Chang Hua Zeng, of North Charleston, pro se.
Steven L. Smith, of Smith Closser, of Charleston, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2011) ("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court].").
AFFIRMED.1 FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.