State v. Green
State v. Green
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Charles Green, Jr., Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002526
Appeal From Beaufort County J. Ernest Kinard, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-458 Submitted August 1, 2015 – Filed September 16, 2015
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Benjamin John Tripp, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCroy Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mary Williams Leddon, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Stanko, 402 S.C. 252, 264, 741 S.E.2d 708, 714 (2013) ("[An appellate court] will not reverse a trial court's decision regarding a jury instruction absent an abuse of discretion."); State v. Lemire, 406 S.C. 558, 565, 753 S.E.2d 247, 251 (Ct. App. 2013) ("An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's ruling is based on an error of law or, when grounded in factual conclusions, is without evidentiary support." (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Light, 378 S.C. 641, 649, 664 S.E.2d 465, 469 (2008) ("A self-defense charge is not required unless it is supported by the evidence."); Stone v. State, 294 S.C. 286, 287, 363 S.E.2d 903, 904 (1988) ("Upon request, a defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on self-defense if he has produced evidence tending to show the four elements of that defense." (emphasis added)).
AFFIRMED.1 SHORT, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.