Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015

State v. Mack

State v. Mack
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided October 21, 2015

State v. Mack

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Mack, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000620

Appeal From Berkeley County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-495 Submitted August 1, 2015 – Filed October 21, 2015

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, and Joseph Mack, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.